CO129-171 - Acting Governor Austin - 1875 [7-11] -- Sir Kennedy - 1875 [12] — Page 593

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

589

indicate that the Legislative Council considered the Magistrates to have the power of dealing with Larceny and other indictable Offences: and there is no doubt that such was the general Opinion in the Colony.

But attention having recently been drawn more closely to the section, it was seen that the Magistrates' power had in fact been confined to offences, not punishable by transportation or penal servitude; and consequently that Larceny, Embezzlement, Burglary, house-breaking, and the majority of the Offences cognisable by Police Sessions had in reality been withdrawn from the jurisdiction of the Police Magistrate.

This Ordinance was therefore prepared to confer upon the Magistrates the jurisdiction which they were supposed to have had, and to indemnify them from the consequences of any convictions made in excess of their jurisdiction.

It is only necessary to refer specially to Sections 5, 7, and 10, the rest of the Ordinance being substantially a re-enactment of the provisions repealed by Section 21; Section 20 is the indemnity clause; Section 10 empowers the Magistrate to sentence Offenders to exposure in the stocks for any time, not exceeding six hours. The stocks were the only...

Edit History

2026-05-21 05:28:02 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
589 indicate that the Legislative Council considered the Magistrates to have the power of dealing with Larceny and other indictable Offences: and there is no doubt that such was the general Opinion in the Colony. But attention having recently been drawn more closely to the section, it was seen that the Magistrates' power had in fact been confined to offences, not punishable by transportation or penal servitude; and consequently that Larceny, Embezzlement, Burglary, house-breaking, and the majority of the Offences cognisable by Police Sessions had in reality been withdrawn from the jurisdiction of the Police Magistrate. This Ordinance was therefore prepared to confer upon the Magistrates the jurisdiction which they were supposed to have had, and to indemnify them from the consequences of any convictions made in excess of their jurisdiction. It is only necessary to refer specially to Sections 5, 7, and 10, the rest of the Ordinance being substantially a re-enactment of the provisions repealed by Section 21; Section 20 is the indemnity clause; Section 10 empowers the Magistrate to sentence Offenders to exposure in the stocks for any time, not exceeding six hours. The stocks were the only...
Baseline (Original)
8 589 indicate that the Sigislative Council considered the Magistrates to have the power of dealing with Larceny and other indictable Offences : and there is no doubt that such was the the general Opinion in in the Colony. But attention having reccully. been drawn more closely to the section it was seen that the Imagistrates power had in fact been confined to offence, ? not punishable by transportation penal servitude; and consequently that Larceny Enterglement, Burglary, house breaking. and the majority of the Offences eognisable by Polley Sessions had in reality been withdrawn from the jurisdiction of the Bolice Magistrate. This tramance was therefore prepared to confer upon the Magistrate= the to jurisdiction which they were supposed to have had, and to indemnify their from the consequture of any convictions made in excess, their jurisdiction. It is only necessary to refer speciall, to lection's 5. 5.7 and 10. the rest of the Ordinance being substantially, re-enactment of the provisions repealed a by bection 21; Section 20 is the indemnity clause section 10 empowers the Magistrat. to sentence Offenders to exposure in the clocks for any time, not exceeding six hours. The clocks were the only
2026-05-21 05:28:02 · Baseline
View content

8

589

indicate that the

Sigislative Council

considered the Magistrates to have the power of dealing with Larceny and other indictable Offences : and there

is no doubt that such was the

the general Opinion in

in the Colony.

But attention having reccully. been drawn more closely to the section it was seen that the Imagistrates power had in fact been confined to offence, ? not punishable by transportation

penal servitude; and consequently that Larceny Enterglement, Burglary, house breaking. and the majority of the Offences eognisable by Polley Sessions had in reality been withdrawn from the jurisdiction of the Bolice Magistrate.

This tramance was

therefore

prepared to confer upon the Magistrate=

the

to jurisdiction which

they were

supposed to have had, and to

indemnify their from the consequture

of any convictions made in excess, their jurisdiction.

It is only necessary to refer speciall, to lection's 5.

5.7 and 10. the rest of the Ordinance being substantially, re-enactment of the provisions repealed

a

by bection 21; Section 20 is the indemnity clause

section 10 empowers the Magistrat. to sentence Offenders to exposure in the clocks for any time, not exceeding six hours. The clocks were the only

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.